Serbian students seize university halls after deadly train station collapse

Serbian students in Novi Sad took over university facilities in November 2024 after a newly renovated train station canopy collapsed, killing 16 people, and are now pressing the government for an independent investigation and systemic reform, The Guardian reported.

Why did the students occupy university campuses?

They acted after authorities dismissed calls for accountability and began targeting protestors, prompting students to turn lecture halls into protest bases. The collapse was widely seen as a product of corrupt procurement and ignored safety standards. When police failed to protect demonstrators and instead blamed them, students responded by barricading themselves inside the Faculty of Technical Sciences, signalling a readiness for a prolonged standoff.

What are the students demanding?

Their core demands include a full, impartial inquiry into the collapse, prosecution of officials responsible for the faulty renovation, and broader measures to build a "normal, functioning state" free from impunity. Novak Simin, a PhD candidate and member of the Student List movement, said the protests aim to replace a culture of silence with transparent governance. The students also call for stronger legal protections for civil society and an end to the vilification of activists.

How does this fit into Serbia’s broader protest history?

Student activism has repeatedly sparked political change in Serbia, from anti‑Milosevic demonstrations in the early 2000s to recent anti‑government rallies. Historically, university campuses have served as safe havens for dissent when public spaces become hostile. The current occupation echoes past moments when students leveraged academic institutions to amplify demands for democratic reforms and rule of law.

The Novi Sad protests illustrate a wider regional frustration with corruption and weak institutions. Analysts note that when civil society groups, especially students, mobilise around a concrete tragedy, it can pressure governments to enact reforms or risk deeper instability. The outcome of these occupations may shape Serbia’s trajectory toward either entrenched authoritarianism or a more accountable democratic system.

Readers wishing to comment can submit letters of up to 300 words via the link provided in the original Guardian article.