Manhattan federal court halts Trump-era visa suspension covering 75 nations
A Manhattan judge nullifies the State Department's pause on immigrant visas that targeted 75 countries under the former administration's policy.

A federal judge in Manhattan has issued a ruling that overturns the State Department’s suspension of immigrant visas affecting citizens of 75 countries. The decision effectively ends the Trump-era policy that barred new immigrant visas for nationals from these nations, restoring the ability of applicants to pursue permanent residency in the United States.
The judge’s order declares the suspension unlawful, finding that the State Department exceeded its authority when it implemented the broad ban. Legal analysts note that the ruling underscores the judiciary’s role in checking executive actions that lack clear statutory backing. The case was brought by a coalition of immigrant advocacy groups and individuals who argued that the ban violated both domestic law and international commitments.
While the exact timeline of the ban’s implementation is not detailed in the ruling, it was introduced during the final months of the Trump administration as part of a broader effort to tighten immigration controls. The policy had drawn criticism from human‑rights organizations, which warned that it would separate families and hinder economic contributions from skilled migrants.
The Manhattan decision does not automatically reinstate all pending visa applications, but it requires the State Department to cease the suspension and resume processing for the affected countries. The department has been instructed to review each case on its merits, without the blanket restriction that had been in place.
The ruling is likely to have immediate implications for thousands of prospective immigrants awaiting approval. It also signals a shift in U.S. immigration policy as the current administration moves to reverse many of the previous era’s restrictive measures. Observers expect further legal challenges may arise as the government adjusts its visa procedures to align with the court’s directive.